Tag archive for "Clean Water Act"

The EPA Wants Your Feedback

EPA Buzz

The EPA Wants Your Feedback

No Comments 17 March 2010

From epa.gov

Release date: 03/16/2010

Contact Information: Enesta Jones, jones.enesta@epa.gov, 202-564-7873, 202-564-4355

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public input on how the agency can better protect and improve the health of our waters. For a two- week period, EPA is holding a Web discussion forum on how the nation can better manage some of the most significant water pollution problems facing our nation. The feedback received on the online forum will help shape the discussion at EPA’s upcoming conference in April, Coming Together for Clean Water, where we will engage approximately 100 executive and local level water leads on the agency’s clean water agenda.

“We look forward to reviewing the ideas and feedback from the public,” said Peter S. Silva, assistant administrator EPA’s Office of Water. “This online discussion is for anyone who wants to share their best solutions for restoring healthy waters and creating sustainable communities across the country.”

EPA wants to receive input from water professionals, advocates, and anyone interested in water quality issues about best solutions—from planning, scientific tools, low impact development, to green infrastructure and beyond—in controlling water pollution and how resources can be better focused to improve these efforts.

To join the discussion: http://blog.epa.gov/waterforum/

Click here for more EPA BUZZ

Basa Resources Fined

EPA Buzz

Basa Resources Fined

No Comments 17 February 2010

From epa.gov
Release date: 02/17/2010
Contact Information: Dave Bary at 214-665-2200 or r6press@epa.gov
(Dallas, Texas – February 17, 2010) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has fined Basa Resources of Dallas, Texas, $850 for violating federal Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulations outlined under the Clean Water Act.
A federal inspection of an oil production facility located on FM 1844 in Gregg County, Texas, revealed the facility’s SPCC plan did not discuss and the facility did not implement appropriate containment and diversionary structures, and inspections and tests required by federal regulations were not in accordance with written procedures developed for the site. Personnel working at the site had no training on the operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges, discharge procedure protocols, and applicable pollutions control laws, rules and regulations. The inspection also found site personnel had no training on general facility operations and no training on the contents of the SPCC plan. As part of an Expedited Settlement Agreement with EPA, the facility has provided certification that all identified deficiencies have been corrected.
SPCC regulations require onshore oil production or bulk storage facilities to provide oil spill prevention, preparedness and responses to prevent oil discharges. The SPCC program helps protect our nation’s water quality. A spill of only one gallon of oil can contaminate one million gallons of water.
Additional information on SPCC regulations is available at http://www.epa.gov/oilspill
More about activities in EPA Region 6: http://www.epa.gov/region6
EPA audio file is available at http://www.epa.gov/region6/6xa/podcast/feb2010.html

Dairy Plant to Pay $350,000

EPA Buzz

Dairy Plant to Pay $350,000

No Comments 17 February 2010

From epa.gov
Former Owner of Dairy Plant in West Point, Neb., to Pay $350,000 to Settle Alleged Violations of Clean Water Act
(Kansas City, Kan., Feb. 16, 2010) – The former owner of a butter and buttermilk production facility in West Point, Neb., has agreed to pay $350,000 in civil penalties to the federal government and the State of Nebraska to settle allegations that the company violated the Clean Water Act by illegally discharging pollutants into the City of West Point’s waste water treatment system resulting in illegal discharges to the Elkhorn River.
Mark J. Peckham, of Sheridan, Wyo., and his company, Peckham, Inc., are the last two of five defendants to settle claims made in a civil lawsuit brought by EPA Region 7 in 2008. The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. (Wimmers).
The five defendants have now agreed to pay a combined total of $723,000 in civil penalties to the United States and the State of Nebraska to settle allegations from the lawsuit; and spend $130,900 on state supervised supplemental environmental projects.
In 2008, EPA Region 7 filed a complaint in federal court alleging that Peckham, West Point Dairy Products (WPDP), and Wimmers illegally discharged pollutants into the City of West Point’s water treatment system from the late 1970s through at least December 2006, and that the City of West Point failed to properly develop discharge limits for those businesses, as required by law.
The discharges by the industries overwhelmed the city’s treatment plant and resulted in discharges of pollutants to the Elkhorn River that violated the limits established to protect the water quality of the river. The Elkhorn River had previously been determined to be an impaired water due to high levels of bacteria.
Peckham’s settlement was filed today in U.S. District Court in Omaha, Neb., and requires payment of a total penalty of $350,000, to be divided equally between the federal government and the State of Nebraska, a co-plaintiff in the case. The settlements previously filed with the court include an agreement by the City of West Point to pay a civil penalty of $150,000 and to install a wind turbine and solar panels for the West Point Public School; and agreements with Wimmers and WPDP to pay civil penalties of $111,600 and $112,500, respectively. They were also required to contribute to state supplemental environmental projects involving Neligh Park Lake and the Nebraska Attorney General’s Environmental Protection Fund.
The Clean Water Act requires municipalities and their industrial dischargers to work together to establish and comply with discharge limits that are designed to protect our nation’s waters. EPA is committed to enforcing these requirements in communities where compliance with the law has not occurred.

Roberson Oil Company, Inc. Fined

EPA Buzz

Roberson Oil Company, Inc. Fined

No Comments 16 February 2010

From epa.gov
Roberson Oil Company, Inc. Fined for Violating the Clean Water Act
Release date: 02/12/2010
Contact Information: Dave Bary at 214-665-2200 or r6press@epa.gov
(Dallas, Texas – February 12, 2010) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has fined the Roberson Oil Company, Inc. of Ada, Oklahoma, $3,693 for violating federal Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulations outlined under the Clean Water Act.
A federal inspection of the company’s Jesse Hunton Viola Unit, an oil field production facility in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, on November 9, 2009, found the facility’s SPCC plan did not meet federal requirements, was not certified by a professional engineer, was not approved by the company’s management and did not designate the person accountable for spill prevention. The SPCC plan did not discuss appropriate containment or diversionary structures and equipment, had inadequate or no prediction of equipment failure which could result in discharges and inadequate or no discussion of oil production facilities. The inspection also revealed the company failed to adequately maintain secondary containment and failed to promptly remove accumulated oil from field drainage systems.
An October 26, 2009, EPA inspection of this facility found an unauthorized discharge of oil field brine into a tributary of Clear Boggy Creek and revealed that water located at the discharge point of entry into the tributary was contaminated from brine discharges and salts. On November 4, 2009, EPA issued the company a Cease and Desist Administrator Order requiring the facility to cease all discharges of pollutants from the facility, remove all brine and residual oil from the tributary of Clear Boggy Creek, and within 30 days provide written certification that these activities had been completed.
SPCC regulations require onshore oil production or bulk storage facilities to provide oil spill prevention, preparedness and responses to prevent oil discharges. The SPCC program helps protect our nation’s water quality. A spill of only one gallon of oil can contaminate one million gallons of water.
Additional information on SPCC regulations is available at http://www.epa.gov/oilspill
More about activities in EPA Region 6: http://www.epa.gov/region6


Today in EHS Weekly Digest

Find Me On

© 2012 todayinehs.com. Powered by Wordpress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes

Environment Blogs