Cummins Pays $2.1 Million

EPA Buzz

Cummins Pays $2.1 Million

No Comments 28 February 2010

Cummins Inc. Agrees to Pay $2.1 Million Penalty for Diesel Engine Clean Air Act Violatoins

Release date: 02/22/2010

Contact Information: Dave Ryan (News Media Only) ryan.dave@epa.gov 202-564-7827 202-564-4355

WASHINGTON — Cummins Inc., a major motor vehicle engine company based in Columbus, Ind., will pay a $2.1 million penalty and recall 405 engines under a settlement agreement resolving violations of the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department announced today.

According to a complaint filed simultaneously with the settlement in federal court in the District of Columbia, between 1998 and 2006, Cummins shipped more than 570,000 heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers nationwide without pollution control equipment included, in violation of the Clean Air Act. This equipment, known as exhaust after-treatment devices (ATDs), controls engine exhaust emissions once the emissions have exited the engine and entered the exhaust system. Typical ATDs include catalytic converters and diesel particulate filters.

“Reliable and effective pollution control systems are essential to protect human health and the environment from harmful engine emissions,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “These requirements are a critical part of EPA’s program to reduce air pollution and secure clean air so that all Americans can breathe easier.”

“This settlement assures that the environment suffers no ill effects because it requires that Cummins not only install the proper pollution control devices but also mitigate the effects of the harmful emissions released as a result of its actions,” said Ignacia S. Moreno, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.

Engine manufacturers must prove through testing that their engine designs meet EPA’s emissions standards and seek certificates of conformity. According to the complaint, Cummins tested the engines with the ATDs to meet the standards, but failed to include the ATDs with the engines when Cummins shipped the engines to the vehicle manufacturers. Instead, Cummins relied upon the vehicle manufacturers to purchase and install the correct ATDs. The United States alleges that the shipment of engines to vehicle manufacturers without the ATDs violates the Clean Air Act’s prohibition on the sale of engines not covered by certificates of conformity.

The settlement requires Cummins to recall approximately 405 engines that were found to have reached the ultimate consumers without the correct ATDs in order to install the correct ATDs.

EPA estimates that Cummins actions resulted in approximately 167 excess tons of nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbon emissions, and 30 excess tons of particulate matter emissions over the lifetime of the non-conforming engines. Cummins will mitigate the effects of excess emissions from its non-conforming engines through permanent retirement of emission credits equal to the excess tons of pollution.

Over half the air pollutants in America come from “mobile sources” of air pollution, such as cars, trucks, buses, motorcycles, construction, agricultural and lawn and garden equipment, marine vessels, outboard motors, jet skis and snowmobiles. Mobile source pollutants include smog-forming volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides, toxic air pollutants such as cancer-causing benzene, and particulate matter or “soot.” These pollutants are responsible for asthma and other respiratory illnesses.

The State of California Air Resources Board will receive $420,000 of the civil penalty under a separate settlement agreement with Cummins, continuing a federal government practice of sharing civil penalties with states that participate in clean air enforcement actions.

The Cummins settlement was lodged today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and is subject to a 30-day public comment period.

More information: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/caa/cumminsinc.html

Click here for more EPA BUZZ

Responding to Earthquakes

Featured, Safety Article

Responding to Earthquakes

No Comments 28 February 2010

In light of the events in Chile and Haiti, I feel that it is my responsibility as an EHS Professional to better understand how to protect those responding to earthquakes. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences prepared a training tool to “help workers understand at an awareness level: what an earthquake is, characteristics of an earthquake response, and how to identify and control hazards pertaining to the response and cleanup activities associated with an earthquake.”  Although it is titled as an awareness level training, it is comprehensive and well done.

On a personal note I have been especially moved by these two tragic events because my wife and I hope to one day adopt a child from Haiti.  I encourage everyone to do what you can for Chile and Haiti…

Click here to see the 104 slide presentation.  http://tools.niehs.nih.gov/wetp/public/hasl_get_blob.cfm?ID=7619

Click here for more Featured Articles

Comment on Asbestos Research

Featured, NIOSH Buzz

Comment on Asbestos Research

No Comments 25 February 2010

NIOSH Invites Public Comment on Newly Revised Draft Asbestos Research Roadmap
Contact: Fred Blosser, (202) 245-0645
A newly revised version of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s (NIOSH) draft Current Intelligence Bulletin, “Asbestos Fibers and Other Elongate Mineral Particles: State of the Science and Roadmap for Research,” is available for public review and comment. The draft is posted online at www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/public/099-C/.
The draft document addresses current scientific questions about occupational exposure and toxicity issues relating to asbestos and other elongate mineral particles. It suggests new avenues of research to engage those questions, to reduce scientific uncertainties in those areas, and to provide a sound scientific foundation for future policy development. Public comments are invited until April 16, 2010.
The new Version 4 of the draft document reflects substantial public comment and scientific peer review of previous drafts. Specifically, the new draft incorporates comments from an extensive peer review by an independent committee of the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council. The committee’s report was released in October 2009 and is available atwww.iom.edu/Reports/2009/NIOSH-Research-Roadmap-Asbestos.aspx.
“Asbestos has been a highly visible issue in public health for over three decades and abundant information is in the scientific literature,” the draft document notes.  “However, in part because of the complexity in the mineralogy, the scientific literature has various inconsistencies and inconclusive evidence which have led to uncertainties in identifying and applying the term asbestos for health and regulatory purposes.”
The draft document was developed by a working group of NIOSH scientists and engineers with professional experience in different disciplines that are essential for identifying, understanding, and addressing occupational health concerns related to asbestos and other elongate mineral particles.
“The draft NIOSH roadmap reflects the Institute’s commitment to engaging complex scientific questions that have profound implications for occupational health, and bringing our best scientific tools to bear. It also reflects our commitment to making our efforts publicly transparent, and closely involving our stakeholders,” said NIOSH Director John Howard, M.D. “Scientific transparency and partnership are vital for progress on these issues that continue to demand our attention in the 21st Century.”
Changes in the new draft reflecting comments from the independent IOM/NRC scientific committee include these:
An expanded glossary of terms, with special emphasis on defining mineralogical terms using accepted mineralogical references.
Reorganization of the document to help clarify its purpose of establishing a framework for scientific research based on existing gaps in knowledge.
Emphasizing the importance of bringing together stakeholders to identify specific research projects and to assist in developing priorities for research.
NIOSH is the federal agency that conducts research and makes recommendations for preventing work-related injury, illness, and death. More information about NIOSH
can be found at www.cdc.gov/niosh.

AWP Education

Featured, Safety News

AWP Education

No Comments 24 February 2010

From Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM)

Industry-wide initiative creates first-ever AWP equipment document on general training and model-specific familiarization
The American Rental Association (ARA), the Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM), the Associated Equipment Distributors (AED), the International Powered Access Federation (IPAF) and the Scaffold Industry Association (SIA) have joined forces for a first-of-its-kind industry initiative to develop an educational document to clarify what is required for general training and model-specific familiarization of aerial work platform (AWP) equipment.
The result of this joint initiative is the Statement of Best Practices of General Training and Familiarization for Aerial Work Platform Equipment, the first such document that is applicable for use by everyone in the industry.  The content addresses:
  • Educating the industry on the industry-recognized-and-supported standards, including the American National Standards Institute/Scaffold Industry Association (ANSI/SIA) A92 Standards and the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) regulations.
  • Presenting best practices and minimum general training guidelines for AWP operators.
  • Emphasizing the differences between general training and familiarization to all parties responsible.
  • Clarifying minimum qualifications of the trainer.
The purpose of this joint initiative and document is the increased safe use of AWP equipment and expanded risk management knowledge for use of these machines throughout the country.
The Statement of Best Practices of General Training and Familiarization for Aerial Work Platform Equipment document will be unveiled during The Rental Show, the ARA’s convention and trade show, Feb. 7-10 at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, Fla. A seminar, “Aerial Work Platform Training Standards: What You Need to Know,” is scheduled from 8-9:30 a.m. Tuesday, Feb. 9, at the Show. This document also will be available from each participating organization.

http://www.aem.org/News/AEMNews/Details.asp?P=713

Click here for more Featured Articles

Today in EHS Weekly Digest

Find Me On

© 2012 todayinehs.com. Powered by Wordpress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes

Environment Blogs